<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Look for Podhammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/</link>
	<description>Podhammer is a podcast dedicated to Warhammer Fantasy. The show covers all the latest tools, tips, tales and tactics from the Warhammer World, with a good helping of sarcasm and comedy. Send your feedback to podhammer@gmail.com or skype us at: podhammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 05:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to admit that I&#039;m not a big fan of the new layout.  I definately preferred the other one.  Two sidebars on the same side is distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to admit that I&#8217;m not a big fan of the new layout.  I definately preferred the other one.  Two sidebars on the same side is distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The  Baroness of Nugginshire</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>The  Baroness of Nugginshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>This changes everything!!11!!oneone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This changes everything!!11!!oneone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I think it looks fine. Maybe a bar on either side, but it doesnt bother me. Also its kinda different. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks fine. Maybe a bar on either side, but it doesnt bother me. Also its kinda different. <img src='http://podhammer.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warwolt</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Warwolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Also, the Anti-Aliasing (Its a way of blurring out the edges to make stuff look smoth. In reality this happens automticly, but with graphics you need to think alot if its a static image) is for a white background. You probably should try get your hands on that icon without a background and put ontop of the background in a single image. So to speak. Should give a better AA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the Anti-Aliasing (Its a way of blurring out the edges to make stuff look smoth. In reality this happens automticly, but with graphics you need to think alot if its a static image) is for a white background. You probably should try get your hands on that icon without a background and put ontop of the background in a single image. So to speak. Should give a better AA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, I have always been a fan of the classic digg 3 column, one on each side, but I am an overly symmetrical kind of guy.

Still the logo and the dramatic red look awesome IMHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, I have always been a fan of the classic digg 3 column, one on each side, but I am an overly symmetrical kind of guy.</p>
<p>Still the logo and the dramatic red look awesome IMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Well I think it looks pretty nice, not too busy and very dramatic. 

I love your logo man, very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think it looks pretty nice, not too busy and very dramatic. </p>
<p>I love your logo man, very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>have to agree with that one, one sidebar on each side would look better.  its feels to heavy with them both on the same side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have to agree with that one, one sidebar on each side would look better.  its feels to heavy with them both on the same side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alonso</title>
		<link>http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Alonso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podhammer.net/2008/04/14/new-look-for-podhammer/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff, just have a couple of suggestions about the new layout. It would probably be better to have one side bar on either side of the main body of text. At the moment with the two bars on the same side, it&#039;s rather distracting. 
Also, I&#039;m not sure about the colour scheme. The reds don&#039;t seem to match with the podhammer logo. Just my opinion. Hope I&#039;ve helped.

Keep up the good work with the podcast, can&#039;t wait for the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, just have a couple of suggestions about the new layout. It would probably be better to have one side bar on either side of the main body of text. At the moment with the two bars on the same side, it&#8217;s rather distracting.<br />
Also, I&#8217;m not sure about the colour scheme. The reds don&#8217;t seem to match with the podhammer logo. Just my opinion. Hope I&#8217;ve helped.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work with the podcast, can&#8217;t wait for the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

